The impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on Clostridioides difficile infection and utilization of fecal microbiota transplantation.

Previous research has demonstrated that the severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) gains cell entry through the angiotensin-converting enzyme 2 receptor, which is abundantly found throughout the gastrointestinal (GI) tract, resulting in a wide array of GI manifestations of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19). By gaining entry into the intestinal epithelial and stromal cells, SARS-CoV-2 has been observed to cause intestinal inflammation and gut dysbiosis. Alterations in gut microbiota are known to be involved in the pathophysiology of Clostridioides difficile infection (CDI). During the initial stages of the COVID-19 pandemic, rates of CDI were similar to historical data despite the increased use of antibiotics. This may be due to increased emphasis on hygiene and protective equipment and reduced C. difficile testing as diarrhea was presumed to be COVID-19 related. Studies also demonstrated additional risk factors for CDI in COVID-19 patients, including length of hospitalization and new abdominal pain during admission. Although not associated with increased mortality, CDI was associated with increased length of hospital stay among patients admitted with COVID-19. Due to fecal viral shedding and concern of oral-fecal transmission of SARS-CoV-2, increased safety regulations were introduced to fecal microbiota transplantation (FMT) leading to reduced rates of this procedure during the COVID-19 pandemic. FMT for recurrent CDI during the COVID-19 pandemic remained highly effective without any reports of SARS-CoV-2 transmission. In addition, limited data show that FMT may be effective in treating COVID-19 and restoring healthy gut microbiota. The goal of this article is to review the impact that the COVID-19 pandemic has had on hospital-acquired CDI and the utilization of FMT.

The Effect of Guselkumab Induction Therapy in Patients With Moderately to Severely Active Ulcerative Colitis: QUASAR Phase 2b Induction Results at Week 12 by Prior Inadequate Response or Intolerance to Advanced Therapy

Introduction: QUASAR (NCT04033445) is a phase 2b randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study that evaluates guselkumab (GUS), an interleukin-23 p19 subunit antagonist, as induction treatment in patients with moderately to severely active ulcerative colitis (UC) who had an inadequate response or intolerance to conventional (ie, thiopurines or corticosteroids) or advanced therapy (ADT;ie, tumor necrosis factor alpha antagonists, vedolizumab, or tofacitinib). Conclusion: Treatment with GUS resulted in greater improvements compared with placebo across key clinical and endoscopic/histologic outcome measures at Week 12 in patients with moderately to severely active UC with or without a history of inadequate response/intolerance to ADT. Efficacy at Week 12 by prior response/intolerance to ADT Placebo IV (N=105) GUS 200 mg IV (N=101) GUS 400 mg IV (N=107) GUS Combined(N=208) Patients with a history of inadequate response/intolerance to ADT 51 46 51 97  Clinical response a1,b,c,d,e (95% CI) 25.5% (14.3, 39.6) 54.3%* (39.0, 69.1) 47.1%* (32.9, 61.5) 50.5%* (40.2, 60.8)  Clinical remission a2,b,c,d,e (95% CI) 7.8% (2.2, 18.9) 17.4% (7.8, 31.4) 17.6% (8.4, 30.9) 17.5% (10.6, 26.6)  Symptomatic remission a3,b,c,d,e (95% CI) 17.6% (8.4, 30.9) 39.1%* (25.1, 54.6) 37.3%* (24.1, 51.9) 38.1%* (28.5, 48.6)  Endoscopic improvement a4,b,c,d,e (95% CI) 9.8% (3.3, 21.4) 23.9% (12.6, 38.8) 21.6% (11.3, 35.3) 22.7% (14.8, 32.3)  Histo-endoscopic mucosal improvement a5,b,c,d,e (95% CI) 5.9% (1.2, 16.2) 13.0% (4.9, 26.3) 19.6%* (9.8, 33.1) 16.5% (9.7, 25.4)  Endoscopic normalization a6,b,c,d,e (95% CI) 5.9% (1.2, 16.2) 10.9% (3.6, 23.6) 5.9% (1.2, 16.2) 8.2% (3.6, 15.6) Patents with no history of inadequate response/intolerance to ADT 54 55 56 111  Clinical response a1,b,c,d,e (95% CI) 29.6% (18.0, 43.6) 67.3%** (53.3, 79.3) 73.2%** (59.7, 84.2) 70.3%** (60.9, 78.6)  Clinical remission a2,b,c,d,e (95% CI) 11.1% (4.2, 22.6) 32.7%* (20.7, 46.7) 32.1%* (20.3, 46.0) 32.4%* (23.9, 42.0)  Symptomatic remission a3,b,c,d,e (95% CI) 22.2% (12.0, 35.6) 58.2%** (44.1, 71.3) 57.1%** (43.2, 70.3) 57.7%** (47.9, 67.0)  Endoscopic improvement a4,b,c,d,e (95% CI) 14.8% (6.6, 27.1) 36.4%* (23.8, 50.4) 39.3%* (26.5, 53.2) 37.8%* (28.8, 47.5)  Histo-endoscopic mucosal improvement a5,b,c,d,e (95% CI) 11.1% (4.2, 22.6) 27.3%* (16.1, 41.0) 33.9%* (21.8, 47.8) 30.6%* (22.2, 40.1)  Endoscopic normalization a6,b,c,d,e (95% CI) 7.4% (2.1, 17.9) 23.6%* (13.2, 37.0) 21.4%* (11.6, 34.4) 22.5%* (15.1, 31.4) * Nominal p-value < 0.05. ** Nominal p-value < 0.001. a1 Clinical response is defined as decrease from induction baseline in the modified Mayo score by ≥30% and ≥2 points, with either a ≥1-point decrease from baseline in the rectal bleeding subscore or a rectal bleeding subscore of 0 or 1. a2 Clinical remission is defined as stool frequency subscore of 0 or 1 with no increase from induction baseline, a rectal bleeding subscore of 0, and an endoscopy subscore of 0 or 1 with no friability present on the endoscopy. a3 Symptomatic remission is defined as a stool frequency subscore of 0 or 1 with no increase from induction baseline and a rectal bleeding subscore of 0. a4 Endoscopic improvement is defined as an endoscopy subscore of 0 or 1 with no friability present on the endoscopy. a5 Histo-endoscopic mucosal improvement is defined as achieving a combination of histologic improvement (neutrophil infiltration in < 5% of crypts, no crypt destruction, and no erosions, ulcerations or granulation tissue according to the Geboes grading system) and endoscopic improvement, a6 Endoscopic normalization is defined as an endoscopy subscore of 0. b Patients who had a prohibited change in UC medication, an ostomy or colectomy, or discontinued study agent due to lack of efficacy or an adverse event of worsening of UC prior to the Week 12 visit were considered not to have achieved the endpoint. c Data after discontinuation of study agent due to COVID-19 related reasons (excluding COVID-19 infection) were considered to be missing. d Patients who were issing one or more components pertaining to a specified endpoint at Week 12 were considered not to have achieved the endpoint. e The p-values were based on the Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel (CMH) chi-square test.

COVID-19 Vaccination Intent and Perceptions Among Patients With Inflammatory Bowel Diseases.

Patients with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) develop coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) at similar rates as the general population, and there was initial concern regarding potential for severe illness.1-4 Vaccinations were authorized for emergency use in the United States in December 2020 and aim to halt the spread of COVID-19. However, there are concerns that people will be hesitant to receive the vaccine for a variety of reasons including insufficient data in certain populations including those with IBD. We surveyed patients with IBD to identify potential concerns regarding COVID-19 vaccination.

Fecal Microbiota Transplantation: The Evolving Risk Landscape.

Fecal microbiota transplantation (FMT) has been recommended in clinical guidelines for the treatment of recurrent Clostridioides difficile infection (CDI). However, it is considered investigational by most regulatory agencies. As the adoption of FMT has increased from a small group of CDI experts alone to more widespread use, there has been a corresponding increase in concern regarding potential risk. FMT is largely considered a safe procedure although risks described range from mild gastrointestinal symptoms to serious infection. Currently, there is variability in how "FMT" is characterized specifically regarding testing approach, which, in turn, impacts the risk profile. This has been highlighted by the rare cases of multidrug-resistant organisms, Shiga toxin-producing Escherichia and enteropathogenic E. coli, recently reported, where these organisms were not screened. These cases have prompted additional screening mandates from the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA), which has maintained its policy of enforcement discretion for the use of FMT for CDI not responding to standard therapy. Here, we examine the evolving risk landscape of FMT.

Immunosuppressive Therapy and Risk of COVID-19 Infection in Patients With Inflammatory Bowel Diseases.

BACKGROUND: The effect of immunosuppressive treatment for immune-mediated diseases on risk of the novel coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) has not been established. We aimed to define the effect of targeted biologic and immunomodulator therapy on risk of COVID-19 in a multi-institutional cohort of patients with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD). METHODS: We identified patients 18 years and older who received care for IBD at Partners Healthcare between January 2019 and April 2020. The primary outcome was development of COVID-19 defined as a positive polymerase chain reaction test for severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2. Multivariable regression models were used to examine the effect of immunosuppression on risk of COVID-19 and its outcomes. RESULTS: In a cohort of 5302 IBD patients, 39 (0.7%) developed COVID-19. There was no difference in age, sex, or race between IBD patients with and without COVID-19. The rate of COVID-19 was similar between patients treated with immunosuppression (0.8%) compared with those who were not (0.64%; P = 0.55). After adjusting for age, sex, race, and comorbidities, use of immunosuppressive therapy was not associated with an increased risk of COVID-19 (odds ratio, 1.73; 95% confidence interval, 0.82-3.63). The presence of obesity was associated with a higher risk of COVID-19 (odds ratio, 8.29; 95% confidence interval, 3.72-18.47). There were 7 hospitalizations, 3 intensive care unit stays, and 1 death. Older age and obesity but not immunosuppressive treatment were associated with severe COVID-19 infection. CONCLUSIONS: The use of systemic immunosuppression was not associated with an increased risk of COVID-19 in a multi-institutional cohort of patients with IBD.

Reorganisation of faecal microbiota transplant services during the COVID-19 pandemic.

The COVID-19 pandemic has led to an exponential increase in SARS-CoV-2 infections and associated deaths, and represents a significant challenge to healthcare professionals and facilities. Individual countries have taken several prevention and containment actions to control the spread of infection, including measures to guarantee safety of both healthcare professionals and patients who are at increased risk of infection from COVID-19. Faecal microbiota transplantation (FMT) has a well-established role in the treatment of Clostridioides difficile infection. In the time of the pandemic, FMT centres and stool banks are required to adopt a workflow that continues to ensure reliable patient access to FMT while maintaining safety and quality of procedures. In this position paper, based on the best available evidence, worldwide FMT experts provide guidance on issues relating to the impact of COVID-19 on FMT, including patient selection, donor recruitment and selection, stool manufacturing, FMT procedures, patient follow-up and research activities.